WithdrawnNot Applicable

Splint Versus Non-splint Implant Impressions

Stopped: Ethical commentate has not be obtained by the institution.

Italy0Started 2010-06

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of heavy Vinyl PolySiloxane (VPS) and splinted implants impression (Study Group, SG) technique versus plaster implant impression (Control Group, CG) technique, in 12 edentulous patients rehabilitated with the All-on-4/6 concept and Procera® Implant Bridge (P.I.B.). A longitudinal, double blinded, randomised clinical trial (RCT) was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the impression. All patients were monitored from implant placement until prosthetic loading.

Who can participate

Age range21 Years – 90 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 21 years or older. * Both genders. * Fully edentulous patients. * Both maxilla and mandible. * Dental implant rehabilitation utilizing the All-on-4 concept at least 8 weeks before impression. * External hex dental implant. * Patients with ability to understand and sign the informed consent prior to starting the study. * Adequate oral hygiene. * Immediate functional loading. * Implant stability quote value =/\> 65 from implant placement to final prosthetic rehabilitation. Exclusion Criteria: * Failure of one or more inclusion criteria.

What they're measuring

Implant failure

Timeframe: Up to 5 years after implant placement

Trial details

NCT IDNCT01104363

SponsorHospital San Pietro Fatebenefratelli

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2010-09

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Dental Implants trials