Comparison of Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) With Propranolol in Non Cirrhotic Portal Hyperte… (NCT01000779) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Comparison of Endoscopic Variceal Ligation (EVL) With Propranolol in Non Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension (NCPH)
India100 participantsStarted 2005-01
Plain-language summary
Background: Variceal bleeding is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Non Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension (NCPH). Beta blockers (BB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) have been used to prevent rebleeding in these patients, largely based on data from cirrhotic patients. Endotherapy in the form of EST has been well studied in preventing rebleed in patients with NCPH. Initial studies showed that EST significantly reduced the rebleeding rate in patients of NCPH. Data from these studies suggests a rebleed rate of approximately 25% at 2yr and 35% at 5 years.
Beta blockers have been found to be quite effective in both primary as well as secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic and are accepted mode of treatment. In contrast to liver cirrhosis, published data on the effect of beta blocker therapy on NCPH are scanty. Animal data and human data suggests that beta blockers reduce portal pressure in patients with NCPH. In two placebo controlled trials of propranolol on secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in non cirrhotic patients. both studies demonstrated the efficacy of propranolol in decreasing rebleed rate. However, no comparisons hae been made with EVL till date.
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesis that In patients with NCPH, treatment with beta blockers will lead to reduction in portal pressure and decrease in portosystemic shunting leading to reduction in variceal rebleeding Aim of the study: Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of Propranolol and EVL in the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with NCPH.
Who can participate
Age range
2 Years – 75 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients with Non Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension (NCPH) presenting to our Liver Diseases Follow-up Clinic with history of hemetemesis and/or malena within the past 6 weeks and proven to have esophageal varices as the bleeding source on upper GI endoscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
* A history of surgery for portal hypertension
* Patients already on a EST, EVL, or glue injection program before presenting to our hospital
* Patients already on beta blockers for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleed
* Severe cardiopulmonary or renal disease
* Bradycardia (basal heart rate, \<50 beats per minute \[bpm\]) or complete heart block
* A history of severe side effects or contraindications to β- blockers, like bronchial asthma, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, prostatic hypertrophy, or arterial hypotension (systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg)
* Refusal to give informed written consent to participate in the trial
* Patients bleeding from gastric varices or Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy (PHG).
* Patients who had a failure of primary hemostasis during acute bleed were also excluded.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Rebleed, death
Timeframe: At least 3 months after last enrollment