TerminatedPhase 2

The Impact of Treating Minor Uterine Cavity Abnormalities Diagnosed by Office Hysteroscopy in Unselected In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) Cases

Stopped: Abnormality prevalence revealed to be much lower than expected.

Netherlands700 participantsStarted 2007-06

Plain-language summary

This is a comparative, controlled trial to evaluate the impact of treating undetected, asymptomatic, predefined minor uterine cavity abnormalities on the success of IVF treatment.

Who can participate

Age range

36 Years

Sex

FEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Normal Transvaginal Ultrasound * No prior hysteroscopy * Regular menstrual cycle * Single embryo transfer * BMI between 18 and 29 * Presence of both ovaries * Primary or secondary infertility * Women indicated for a first IVF/ICSI cycle Exclusion Criteria: * Recurrent miscarriage * Prior hysteroscopic treatments * Endometriosis \> AFS Stage II * Meno-metrorrhagia (defined as any intermenstrual loss of blood) * Submucosal/Intracavitary Fibroids taking more than 50% of the cavity * Hydrosalpinx * FSH/LH \> 12IU/L on day 3 * Polyps taking more than 50% of the cavity * Severe adhesions \> grade II

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Cumulative implantation rate

Timeframe: One year

Trial details

NCT IDNCT00830401

SponsorUMC Utrecht

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2008-11

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Minor Intra-uterine Abnormalities trials