Stopped: Protocol was terminated due to enrollment + feasibility issues. Aim 2 not conducted. Aims 1 + 3 were conducted in part. During Aim 3 the IRB requested that the study be transitioned under a new protocol (2018-9208) in order to simplify reporting.
Intensive glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is associated with clear health benefits. However, despite development of insulin analogs, pump/multi-dose treatment and continuous glucose monitoring, maintaining near-normal glycemia remains an elusive goal for most patients, in large part owing to the risk of hypoglycemia. T1DM patients are susceptible to hypoglycemia due to defective counterregulatory responses (CR) characterized by: 1) deficient glucagon release during impending/early hypoglycemia; 2) additional hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) and exercise-associated autonomic failure (EAAF) that blunt the sympathoadrenal responses to hypoglycemia following repeated episodes of hypoglycemia or exercise as well as degrading other CR; and 3) hypoglycemia unawareness (HU), lowering the threshold for symptoms that trigger behavioral responses (e.g. eating). Thus, the risk of hypoglycemia in T1DM impedes ideal insulin treatment and leads to defaulting to suboptimal glycemic control. There are two approaches that could resolve this important clinical problem: 1) perfection of glucose sensing and insulin and glucagon delivery approaches (bioengineered or cell-based) that mimic normal islet function and precisely regulate glucose continuously, or 2) a drug to enhance or normalize the pattern of CR to hypoglycemia. Despite much research and important advances in the field, neither islet transplantation nor biosensor devices have emerged as viable long-term solutions for the majority of patients. Over the past several years, the Diabetes Research Center laboratory at Albert Einstein College of Medicine has explored the approach of enhancing CR by examining mechanisms responsible for HAAF/EAAF and searching for potential pharmacological methods to modulate the CR to hypoglycemia. The work by the laboratory has led to a paradigm shift in the field of hypoglycemia, exemplified by the novel hypothesis and published experimental data supporting a role for opioid signaling that resulted in the initiation of exploratory clinical trials by other research groups.
Age range
21 Years – 60 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Response Rate - Morphine Sulfate Study
Timeframe: Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~7 months apart. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported.
Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Via Glucose Infusion Rate - Naloxone Study
Timeframe: Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~5 months apart. Data from the five timepoints over the final hour of the 1st and 3rd clamp episodes were averaged/reported.
Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP) Response Rate - Epinephrine Study
Timeframe: Obtained every 15 minutes during the 1st and 3rd 2-hour hypoglycemic episodes (on Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Data from the final hour of the 3rd clamp episode were averaged/reported.
Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Morphine Sulfate Study
Timeframe: Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~7 months apart.
Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Naloxone Study
Timeframe: Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~5 months apart.
Counterregulatory Response to Hypoglycemia - Epinephrine Study
Timeframe: Approximately 2 Days following intervention (Day 1 and Day 2), crossover visits up to ~19 months apart.
Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Morphine Sulfate Study
Timeframe: Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported
Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Naloxone Study
Timeframe: Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported
Hypoglycemic Symptom Scores - Epinephrine Study
Timeframe: Obtained at the end of each hypoglycemic episode on Day 2, crossover visits up to ~19 months apart. Summarized mean values for each participant during the 3rd hypoglycemic episode on Day 2 are reported