CompletedNot Applicable

An RSA and DEXA Study on Migration of Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) Joint Prostheses of the Hand

Denmark30 participantsStarted 2004-06

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the early migration and the periprosthetic bone changes of cemented versus non-cemented interphalangeal implants using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Furthermore, a thorough occupational therapist evaluation on the functional progress prior to and after surgery will be assessed.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with osteoarthrosis of the PIP joints. * Patients with sufficient bone quality for implantation of a non-cemented prosthesis. This is estimated by the surgeon preoperatively. * Informed written patient consent. * Patients must read and understand Danish. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with neuromuscular or vascular diseases in the affected upper extremity. * Patients who, preoperatively, are found to have unsuitable bone quality for un-cemented arthroplasty fixation, for instance bone cysts not visible on x-ray. * Patients who cannot refrain from taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) postoperatively including cox-2 inhibitors. * Patients with previously diagnosed osteoporosis. * Women who are pregnant or are at risk of getting pregnant during the time of investigation. * Patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

PIP implant migration evaluated by RSA

Timeframe: 2010

Periprosthetic bone changes evaluated by DEXA

Timeframe: 2010

Trial details

NCT IDNCT00175188

SponsorUniversity of Aarhus

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2010-08

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Osteoarthritis trials