Long-Term Results of DDD Pacing in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (NCT00001530) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Long-Term Results of DDD Pacing in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
United States120 participantsStarted 1996-04
Plain-language summary
DDD pacing improves symptoms and relieves LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Notably, when pacing is temporarily discontinued, the beneficial effects of pacing are evident in sinus rhythm. The long term results of this novel therapy are, however, uncertain. We propose (1) to record the hemodynamic changes following \>4 years of pacing; and (2) to determine whether DDD pacing continues to be necessary in patients who have had a substantial relief of their LVOT obstruction. Patients who have had \>50% reduction in LVOT pressure gradients will be randomized to two pacing modalities: DDD at 70 beats per minute and AAI pacing at 70 beats per minute (DDD switched off), and reevaluated after a six-month period.
Who can participate
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Group 1:
HCM patients, aged grater than 20 years of either gender who received DDD pacemakers at the NIH at least 4 years ago, for relief of LVOT obstruction and drug-refractory symptoms.
Group 2:
HCM patients selected from Group 1 who at the follow-up cardiac catheterization are demonstrated to have either (1) no significant LVOT obstruction (less than 30mm HG at rest and less than 50mm HG with Isuprel); or (2) a substantial reduction of the LVOT obstruction (greater than 50% reduction in LVOT gradient).
Patient who have developed a heart block will be excluded from group 2.
Females must have a negative pregnancy test.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Trial details
NCT IDNCT00001530
SponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)