Back to search
Glass Ionomer Cement
Clinical trial pipeline · Data from ClinicalTrials.gov
See which Glass Ionomer Cement trials you may qualify forClinical trial pipeline · Data from ClinicalTrials.gov
See which Glass Ionomer Cement trials you may qualify forThis randomized split-mouth clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical performance of bioactive restorative materials used in Class II restorations in permane…
This study will investigate the performance and cost-effectiveness of glass-ionomer restorations placed in school children in an outreach setting in rural areas…
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare post-cementation sensitivity between resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer…
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the short-term effectiveness of two minimally invasive treatments-Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (A…
The main objective of this RCT is to compare the efficacy of a powder/water jet prophylaxis device and conventional hand excavation in excavating root surface c…
In this split mouth study design, 34 orthodontic patients coming for fixed appliance treatment will be bonded with standard light-cure composite bonding materia…
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical success of fiberglass crowns applied to primary teeth and to assess the impact of two di…
This randomized controlled trial aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of four ion-releasing restorative materials in the proximal cavities of primary mola…
Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of Alkasite restorative material versus glass ionomer in restoration of primary molars.
STUDY DESIGN Post market clinical follow-up; pilot study, prospective, controlled, randomized, split-mouth, blinded evaluation INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE OF STUDY…
to investigate the effect of modifying GIC with different formulations on the antibacterial activity and clinical performance in reference to unmodified glass i…
evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte ® ( a HVGIC) and Plafique® Bulk Flow composite resin when placed in class II cavities in primary molars.
the study was conducted to compare and evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte and SDR® flow+ in class II cavities in primary molar
The aim of the present study is to assess Flowable Giomer Beautifil Flow Plus X (Shofu Dental Corporation, Japan) and Glass-hybrid-added HVGIC, Equia Forte (GC…
This study will investigate the clinical performance of a novel restorative glass ionomer (DeltaFil, DMG) in comparison to an established restorative glass iono…
The goal of this observational study invitro study was to compare the different cementation techniques used to lute full veneer crowns on extracted and prepared…
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical success of modified celluloid strip crown restorations applied using interim therapeutic restoration and high…
The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performances of high-viscosity glass ionomer (GI), glass carbomer (GC), zirconia-reinforced GI (ZIR), and bulk-…
Aim of the study The aim of the presented study is to evaluate: I- The clinical performance of flowable polyacid-modified composite resin 'compomer' and resin…