Class V Restorations
Clinical trial pipeline · Data from ClinicalTrials.gov
See which Class V Restorations trials you may qualify forClinical trial pipeline · Data from ClinicalTrials.gov
See which Class V Restorations trials you may qualify forPostoperative sensitivity is a common complication following Class V composite restorations, particularly in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). This randomiz…
The purpose of the 12-month clinical study was to evaluate and compare preheated, sonic-activated, and flowable composite resins used in Class V restorations.
Diabetes mellitus is associated with structural and biochemical alterations in dentin that may negatively affect the clinical performance and longevity of adhes…
Using bioactive injectable resin composite in anterior class v carious lesions can provide better aesthetic outcome and marginal integrity by releasing multiple…
To evaluate and compare the 2-year clinical performance of Class V restorations using various restorative systems with ion-releasing and non-ion-releasing compo…
This study will compare between S-PRG-containing injectable flowable resin composite (Beautifil Flow Plus X) and smart bioactive flowable resin composite (Activ…
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a ne…
The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate three different bioactive restorative material in cervical carious lesion in high caries risk patients. Reducing…
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of three dental adhesive systems used to bond Class V cavity fillings in adult teeth.
Treatment clinical trial, randomized, controled, parallel, double-blinded, with four groups, that aims to evaluate the best application strategy when using a ne…
In restorative dentistry, to enhance bond strength between dentin and simplified adhesive systems, new materials or applications are constantly being developed…
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new composite resin (SHOFU Beautifil II LS) vs a control (3M/ESPE Filtek Supreme) for…
The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate the shade matching and clinical performance of the Universal shade composites Omnichroma and GC Essentia versus t…
Cention N will have the same clinical performance as resin-modified glass ionomer in cervical carious lesions. Evaluation of restorations will be done at baseli…
Brief Summary: Retrospective study to evaluate the clinical performance of two restorative materials - glass-ionomer (GI) and resin-modified glass-ionomer (RMGI…
The study will be conducted to assess the marginal integrity of different types of restorations (ketac ™ N100 - ketac™ Universal and bulk fill flowable composit…
Background Resin composites are effective in restoring damaged teeth due to their good esthetics, high surface gloss, and clinically acceptable wear resistance1…
Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus Resin Modifeid Glass Ionoer (RMGI) in class V o will be evaluated over 12 months using United Stat…
During restorative procedures, different isolation methods of the operative field can be used to promote moisture control and retraction of the gingival tissues…