Transradial vs Transfemoral Group-Randomized Efficacy and Safety Trial for Cerebral Angiography (NCT07544043) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Transradial vs Transfemoral Group-Randomized Efficacy and Safety Trial for Cerebral Angiography
2,473 participantsStarted 2026-05-01
Plain-language summary
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach for performing full cerebral angiography. Participants will undergo cerebral angiography via one of the two approaches and will be followed up during and after the procedure. The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the success rate of completing full cerebral angiography (including superselective catheterization of bilateral common carotid arteries, subclavian arteries near the vertebral artery origin, and the aortic arch) via the transradial approach versus the transfemoral approach. During the study, the medical team will also document procedural details, incidence of complications, patient comfort, and related costs to comprehensively evaluate the clinical performance differences between the two approaches.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Age \> 18 years;
✓. Patients requiring full cerebrovascular angiography;
✓. Objective evidence indicates the patient is suitable for transfemoral or transradial cerebrovascular angiography, with upper limb vascular ultrasound 4.showing a radial artery internal diameter ≥ 1.5 mm;
✕. Presence of access vessel disease or anatomical variation deemed potentially hazardous to the subject, such as aortic arch interruption, subclavian artery occlusion, or aortic dissection;
✕. Pregnancy;
What they're measuring
1
The completion of cerebral angiography
Timeframe: 30 minutes
Trial details
NCT IDNCT07544043
SponsorGansu Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital