A Phase 1 Study of BPX-601 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Adult Participants With Prostate Cancer That Has… (NCT07543055) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of BPX-601 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Adult Participants With Prostate Cancer That Has Returned, is Resistant to Treatment and Has Spread
36 participantsStarted 2026-06-01
Plain-language summary
This study will test a study drug called BPX-601, a CAR-T cell product manufactured from the patient's own T-cells, to see if it can help treat advanced prostate cancer. BPX-601 is a drug that is only used in clinical studies.
The study is looking at:
* What side effects BPX-601 might cause
* What is the best dose of BPX-601
* How well BPX-601 may work to destroy prostate cancer
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
MALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate without pure small cell carcinoma
. Metastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) with PSA value at screening ≥4 ng/mL that has progressed within 6 months prior to screening, as defined in the protocol
. Has received ≥2 lines prior systemic therapy approved in the metastatic and/or castration-resistant setting \[in addition to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)\] including at least 1 second-generation anti-androgen therapy (eg, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide)
. Has had either orchiectomy OR is on Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist therapy with serum testosterone \<50 ng/dL AND agrees to stay on LHRH agonist or antagonist therapy during the study
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Occurrence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Timeframe: Up to 4 years
2
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Timeframe: Up to Day 28
3
Occurrence of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
. Structurally unstable bone lesions suggesting impending fracture
. Clinical or radiographic evidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other known thromboembolic event that has not been definitively treated. Participants with prior history of coagulopathy must be on low-molecular weight heparin prophylaxis or prophylactic dose of oral anticoagulant and asymptomatic within 4 weeks of the planned BPX-601 infusion
. Inadequate renal function defined by creatinine clearance \<60 mL/min calculated by 24-hour urine collection or using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
. Inadequate hepatic function defined by Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2.5 × ULN or \>5 × ULN, if liver metastases, and/or total bilirubin \>1.5 × ULN, as described in the protocol
. Inadequate bone marrow function defined by Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) \<1.5 × 10\^9/L or platelet count \<150 × 10\^9/L. At least 7 days must have passed since the last dose of filgrastim (or 14 days since the last dose of pegfilgrastim) and at least 7 days must have passed since the last platelet transfusion at the time of ANC or platelet count.