The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether rescue distal mechanical thrombectomy can improve outcomes in patients with persistent distal occlusions after successful proximal mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Many patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion undergo emergency treatment with proximal mechanical thrombectomy, which removes the main clot and restores flow in a large artery. However, in some patients, one or more smaller distal arteries remain occluded after successful proximal recanalization. It is not yet known whether treating these persistent distal occlusions improves angiographic or clinical outcomes. This study will compare two approaches: Rescue distal mechanical thrombectomy: an additional distal mechanical thrombectomy procedure is performed during the same endovascular session. Conservative management: no additional distal endovascular intervention is performed after successful proximal mechanical thrombectomy. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Is rescue distal mechanical thrombectomy feasible in this setting? * Is it safe? * Does it improve angiographic and clinical outcomes? Participants will be randomly assigned during the index endovascular procedure to one of the two study groups and will be followed with imaging and clinical assessments during hospitalization and at 90 days. Approximately 72 participants will take part in this study at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM).
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Number of participants successfully randomized among screen-eligible participants
Timeframe: Periprocedural
Guylaine Gevry, BSc. Project manager