The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the comparative effects of Global postural re-education (GPR) and National Academy of Sports Medicine (NASM) based corrective exercises in participants with upper cross syndrome (UCS). The main questions it aims to answer: * Is there any difference between the effects of GPR and NASM-based corrective exercises in decreasing pain and disability and improving endurance in participants with upper cross syndrome? * Is there any difference between the effects of GPR and NASM-based corrective exercises in improving cranio-vertebral angle of participants with upper cross syndrome? Researchers will compare GPR and NASM-based corrective exercises to see if there is difference between the two treatments in decreasing pain, disability and improving endurance and cranio-vertebral angle. Participants will be: * Given treatment 3 times a week for 8 weeks. * Assessed before first treatment session (baseline), at 4th week of intervention and at the end of last treatment session (8th week).
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Mean change in endurance from baseline on Progressive iso-inertial lifting evaluation (PILE) test at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Timeframe: From enrollment (before first treatment session) to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Mean change in pain score from baseline on Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Timeframe: From enrollment (before first treatment session) to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.
Mean change in disability score from baseline on Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 4 weeks and 8 weeks
Timeframe: From enrollment (before first treatment session) to the end of treatment at 8 weeks.