Cerebral palsy is one of the most common causes of physical disability in childhood and is often associated with impaired trunk control, reduced upper limb strength, and limitations in functional mobility and daily activities. Trunk control is essential for postural stability and directly influences upper limb function and the ability to perform goal-directed tasks. Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT/Bobath) and functional physiotherapy are widely used approaches in pediatric neurorehabilitation. NDT/Bobath focuses on facilitating postural control and promoting efficient movement patterns, while functional physiotherapy emphasizes task-specific training and the improvement of motor performance through meaningful activities. However, evidence comparing the effectiveness of these approaches on trunk control and upper arm strength remains limited. This study aims to investigate and compare the effectiveness of Neurodevelopmental Treatment (NDT/Bobath) and functional physiotherapy on upper arm strength and trunk control in children with cerebral palsy. Participants will be allocated to different intervention groups, with each group receiving one of the two therapeutic approaches. Additionally, wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) will be used to provide objective and quantitative assessment of trunk movement under both static (sitting) and dynamic (functional movement) conditions. We hypothesize that both intervention groups will demonstrate improvements in trunk control and upper arm strength, with potential differences in the magnitude of improvement between the two approaches. Furthermore, IMU-based measurements are expected to detect subtle changes in movement quality that may not be captured by traditional clinical assessment tools. The findings of this study may contribute to a better understanding of the comparative effectiveness of commonly used therapeutic approaches and support evidence-based decision-making in pediatric rehabilitation.
Age range
4 Years – 12 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change from Baseline in trunk control during Static Sitting and Static Standing at 12 Weeks using IMU's sensors
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in Handgrip Strength at 12 Weeks
Timeframe: Baseline and 12 weeks