The FLOW project involves the implementation and rigorous evaluation of an evidence-based, multi-level mentalization prevention program targeting social and psychological determinants of well-being in four European countries (Germany, Lithuania, Spain, and Switzerland). Prevention programs will be tailored to the needs of 8-10 year old children in elementary schools and their parents. All children will participate in a project day focused on mental health. Parents will either attend one of two parent trainings of varying lengths or receive a parenting guidebook. A total of 5,000 children, along with their teachers and parents, are included in the survey. To measure long-term effects, surveys are conducted over the course of a whole year. The project examines the following hypotheses: Primary hypotheses: A multilevel mentalization based prevention program will lead to significantly greater improvements in well-being and mental health among children and parents compared to control groups, as measured at the post-intervention assessment. Secondary hypotheses: 1. A universal prevention program on mental health enhances help-seeking behavior and reduces mental health stigma among children, parents and teachers at post and follow-up measurement. 2. A universal prevention program on mental health improves classroom climate and increases teaching efficacy at post and follow-up measurement. 3. A multi-level mentalization based prevention program leads to greater improvements in well-being and mental health among children and parents than control groups, as measured at follow-up. 4. A multi-level mentalization based prevention program leads to greater improvements in parental efficacy and family adjustment in parents and reduces parental stress compared to control groups at post and follow-up measurement. 5. The longer intervention group will yield greater improvements in outcome measures compared to the shorter intervention group.
Age range
8 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Children's well-being measured by the KIDSCREEN-10 (Ravens-Sieberer et al., 2010)
Timeframe: From enrollment/baseline (t-1; t0) to post (t1 after end of interventions at 3 months) to follow-up 1 (FU1 after 6 months) to follow-up 2 (FU2 after 12 months-only parent report)
Children's mental health measured by the SDQ (Goodman, 1997)
Timeframe: From enrollment (t-1) to post (t1 after end of interventions at 3 months) to follow-up 1 (F1 after 6 months) to follow-up 2 (F2 after 12 months)
Parental well-being measured by the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol Group, 1990; Herdman et al., 2011)
Timeframe: From enrollment (t-1) to post (t1 after end of interventions at 3 months) to follow-up 1 (F1 after 6 months) to follow-up 2 (F2 after 12 months).
Parental mental health measured by the DASS-21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)
Timeframe: From enrollment (t-1) to post (t1 after end of interventions at 3 months) to follow-up 1 (F1 after 6 months) to follow-up 2 (F2 after 12 months)