Signature Response to Light Therapy in Unipolar and Bipolar Major Depressive Episode (MDE) (NCT07462637) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
Signature Response to Light Therapy in Unipolar and Bipolar Major Depressive Episode (MDE)
France173 participantsStarted 2026-03-01
Plain-language summary
Major depressive episode (MDE) are severe and common psychiatric disorders that affect up to 20% of the general population. MDE cause a decrease in psychosocial functioning, quality of life, and is associated with a high rate of suicides. They will be the leading cause of disability by 2030 according to the World Health Organization. The international effort carried out to identify biomarkers of MDE has been hampered by the heterogenous nature of MDE (unipolar, bipolar, seasonal, non-seasonal) and their heterogeneous response to treatment. Response rate to antidepressant drugs is only 40 to 50%, leading to the use of drug combinations and development of alternative therapeutics such as light therapy (LT). It was demonstrated that LT, as a first line treatment of MDE with and without seasonal pattern (± SP), has comparable efficacy to antidepressants. LT has the advantage of being also effective in improving both sleep, alertness and circadian rhythms, which may be altered in depression, contrary to antidepressant drugs that target mainly mood. Further research is warranted to determine the most efficient lighting parameters to use depending on depression characteristics, as well as to identify signature biomarkers of response. Besides, no studies have directly evaluated both subjective and objective biomarkers of sleep, wake, biological rhythms, and light signalling pathways and activation in patients with MDE ± SP. The main objective of the research will be to identify the signature of response to LT examining the correlation between the measures of biological and clinical parameters before LT and their evolution at the end of the procedure, and the therapeutic response.
The primary endpoint of the study will be the therapeutic response to LT measured by the difference of MADRS score between Visit 1 and Visit 4 (end of the therapeutic protocol). Therapeutic response to LT considered as a success will be defined as at least a 50% reduction of MADRS score between the two visits.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 65 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Adults between 18 and 65 years old
✓. Patients with a diagnosis of MDE as part of a unipolar or bipolar disorder (DSM-5 TR criteria)
✓. Patients with a clinician-rated MADRS score ≥ 20 indicating a moderate to severe depressive symptoms with a prescription of LT for MDE treatment
✓. Patients for whom light therapy is prescribed
✓. Patients able to understand French.
✓. Patients able to sign informed consent.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Patients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia, suffering from paranoid or delusional disorders, any other psychotic features or other nonstabilized mental disorders
What they're measuring
1
Therapeutic response to luminotherapy measured by the difference of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score between Visit 1 (inclusion) and Visit 4 (5 weeks)
Timeframe: At baseline (visit 1 - week 0) and visit 4 (week 5)
✕. Patients with other antidepressant strategies than LT or mood stabiliser initiated in the month prior to inclusion
✕. Patients with a therapeutic resistance of current MDE (lack of response to ≥2 antidepressants of 2 different classes at therapeutic doses for \>6 weeks)
✕. Patients with a LT used in the last 1 month
✕. Patient with ophtalmic pathologies (cataract, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, severe myopia \> 6D, etc.) or diseases affecting the retina (retinitis pigmentosa, diabetes, herpes, hereditary retinal disorders etc.).
✕. Patient with photosensitive epilepsy
✕. Patients with a C-SSRS score ≥ 4
✕. For the MRI group, patient presenting one or several MRI contrindications