Testing the Addition of Iberdomide to Therapy in People With Neuroblastoma That Has Come Back, No… (NCT07437963) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingPhase 1/2
Testing the Addition of Iberdomide to Therapy in People With Neuroblastoma That Has Come Back, Not Responded to Treatment, or Gotten Worse
76 participantsStarted 2026-07-30
Plain-language summary
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of iberdomide when given together with chemoimmunotherapy drugs and to see how well it works in treating patients with neuroblastoma that has come back after a period of improvement (relapsed), that does not respond to treatment (refractory), or that is growing, spreading, or getting worse (progressive) following prior chemoimmunotherapy. Iberdomide is a cereblon-modulating agent. It works by helping the immune system kill tumor cells. Chemoimmunotherapy is chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Chemotherapy drugs, such as cyclophosphamide and topotecan, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Immunotherapy with dinutuximab, may induce changes in body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factors (GM-CSF), such as sargramostim, may increase the production of blood cells and may help the immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. Giving iberdomide with chemoimmunotherapy may be safe, tolerable, and/or effective in treating patients with relapsed, refractory, or progressive neuroblastoma following prior chemoimmunotherapy.
Who can participate
Age range
1 Year – 30 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients must be ≥ 1 year of age and ≤ 30 years of age at the time of study enrollment
* Patients must have had histologic verification of neuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma or demonstration of neuroblastoma cells in the bone marrow with elevated urinary catecholamines (i.e. \> 2 x upper limit of normal \[ULN\]), at the time of initial diagnosis
* Progressive/relapsed or refractory (defined as persistent disease with overall response no better than minor response \[MR\] to prior therapy per revised International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria \[INRC\]) neuroblastoma based on the revised INRC
* Patients must meet ONE of the following criteria:
* Primary refractory disease
* Primary refractory disease following chemoimmunotherapy as part of induction therapy (e.g., ANBL17P1, ANBL2131 Arm B). Patients with primary refractory disease must have received at least 4 cycles of frontline high-risk induction chemoimmunotherapy
* Primary refractory disease following aggressive multi-drug induction chemotherapy on or according to a high-risk NB protocol (e.g., A3973, ANBL0532, ANBL09P1, ANBL12P1, ANBL1531, or ANBL2131 Arm A) with persistent disease at the conclusion of at least 4 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy used as extended induction or pre-consolidation intensification of therapy for primary refractory disease (e.g., ANBL2131 Arm A with extended induction, ANBL1221, or ANBL1821)
* NOTE: Patients who experienced disease progression either du…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Incidence of therapy-associated dose limiting toxicities (Phase 1)
Timeframe: During cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
2
Recommended phase 2 dose (Phase 1)
Timeframe: Up to the completion of phase 1
3
Proportion of eligible patients who are responders (Phase 2)
Timeframe: Post-randomization up through the end of cycle 12 (Cycle length = 28 days)