Assisted mechanical ventilation is widely used to preserve diaphragmatic activity and improve lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, during assisted ventilation, excessive inspiratory effort may develop and contribute to lung injury, diaphragmatic overload, and patient self-inflicted lung injury. Optimizing ventilator settings to modulate respiratory effort therefore represents a major physiological and clinical challenge. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a key determinant of lung recruitment and respiratory system mechanics and may influence inspiratory effort by modifying lung volume, compliance, and respiratory drive. Despite its widespread use, PEEP titration in clinical practice is still mainly guided by oxygenation parameters, while its direct effects on inspiratory effort during assisted mechanical ventilation remain insufficiently characterized. This physiological randomized crossover study aims to evaluate the effect of four predefined levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (0, 5, 10, and 15 cmHâ‚‚O) on the respiratory system and inspiratory effort in adult patients receiving assisted mechanical ventilation. Patients will be exposed to each PEEP level in randomized order, with stabilization and washout periods between conditions, while ventilatory support settings other than PEEP are kept constant.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes)
Timeframe: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level
Pressure-time product per minute (PTPmin)
Timeframe: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level
Delta Pocc (ΔPocc)
Timeframe: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level
Muscular Pressure Index (PMI)
Timeframe: During the last 5 minutes of each PEEP level