The Clinical Application Value of "Showering Cells" in the Diagnosis of Aspiration Pneumonia (NCT07395310) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
The Clinical Application Value of "Showering Cells" in the Diagnosis of Aspiration Pneumonia
China94 participantsStarted 2026-01-01
Plain-language summary
Based on our team's previous discovery of a unique type of squamous epithelial cell in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of patients with aspiration pneumonia (AP) using microbiological rapid on-site evaluation (M-ROSE) technology-characterized by its distinct morphology and absence of bacterial adhesion on the surface-which we termed "showering cells," we designed a diagnostic test case-control study. Adult patients with pulmonary infection scheduled to undergo bronchoscopy were screened and allocated into an AP group (experimental group) and a non-AP group (control group). BALF sampling and M-ROSE slide preparation were performed following a standardized protocol. Microscopic examination was conducted to detect and manually count "showering cells." Simultaneously, a committee of respiratory and critical care medicine experts determined the gold-standard diagnosis (AP or non-AP) based on composite clinical criteria.
A 2×2 contingency table was constructed to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratios, positive/negative predictive values along with their 95% confidence intervals, and the kappa agreement rate. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of "showering cells" for aspiration pneumonia, from which the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and the optimal cutoff value determined. This study aims to assess the diagnostic utility of "showering cells" and provide a novel cytomorphological tool for the diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 100 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Imaging Findings:Newly developed dependent infiltrates on chest CT (gravity-dependent distribution of new lung infiltrates). Specifically, in the standing/sitting position, infiltrates are predominantly seen in the basal segments of the lower lobes, especially the right lower lobe. In the supine position, infiltrates are primarily located in the posterior segment of the right upper lobe and the dorsal segment of the right lower lobe. These may be accompanied by a small amount of pleural effusion or plate-like atelectasis.
. Clinical History Characteristics:A clear history of aspiration or the presence of at least one high-risk factor for aspiration (e.g., impaired consciousness: sedated state, post-stroke, epileptic seizure; confirmed swallowing dysfunction; gastroesophageal reflux disease; abnormal gag reflex/diminished cough reflex; poor oral hygiene: periodontitis, inadequate denture cleaning; end-stage disease: advanced dementia, malignancy, etc.).
.Meeting 2 or more of the following 3 clinical criteria:（1）.Temperature abnormality: Fever (core temperature \>38.0°C) or hypothermia (core temperature \<36.0°C, more common in elderly or immunocompromised patients).(2).Respiratory symptoms: New onset or worsening of cough, production of purulent sputum (may contain food particles or unusual odor), dyspnea, chest pain, or detection of food particles/gastric contents in tracheal secretions.(3).Abnormal peripheral inflammatory markers: White blood cell count \>10×10⁹/L or \<4×10⁹/L, or presence of a left shift (band neutrophil proportion \>5%).
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.