People living with HIV (PLWH) have poor clinical outcomes when they are excluded from care due to intersectional stigma related to HIV, mental health (MH), and other dimensions. Recent studies and reviews have highlighted three major challenges in identifying and addressing intersectional stigma: a lack of stigma assessment strategies that are multi-dimensional and can be incorporated into routine clinical care, a lack of tailored stigma-reduction activities, and a lack of implementation of multi-level interventions. These gaps make it difficult to recognize and address intersectional stigma, leading to poor HIV care outcomes globally. Digital health tools, co-designed with PLWH and healthcare workers (HCWs), have the potential to assist ART centers in addressing these challenges. Guided by the principles of human-centered design, our team has developed a digital tool with three components that can address the challenges in assessing, prioritizing, and addressing intersectional stigma in ART centers. The components include: 1) a dynamic assessment strategy that can be used during a clinic visit to collect both quantitative (i.e., ratings) and qualitative data (i.e., free text of client's perspectives) on stigma reported by PLWH; 2) a dashboard that incorporates this stigma assessment data alongside routine clinical data (i.e., existing registry of clients in the ART center) so that ART centers can directly link stigma with care engagement, and also identify relevant stigma-reduction activities; and 3) a repository of evidence-based, culturally appropriate activities that can reduce stigma at the intrapersonal-, interpersonal-, and clinic-levels. The three components of the digital intervention are theoretically grounded and are based on prior studies and consultations with local partners. The study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of INCLUDE among clients, HCWs, and ART center leads in four ART centers. For this aim, we will conduct a pilot trial at four ART centers to assess the acceptability and feasibility of INCLUDE. If successful, this study will provide an intervention that can be incorporated into routine clinical practice to systematically identify and address intersectional stigma to improve HIV care, and can be tested in a cluster randomized trial with ART centers in Nepal and other regions that face similar challenges.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Acceptability ratings
Timeframe: 9 months
Acceptability of the INCLUDE tool
Timeframe: 4 and 9 months from baseline
Rate of assessment app launch
Timeframe: 9 months
Assessment Duration
Timeframe: 9 months
Frequency of assessment completion
Timeframe: 9 months
Frequency of user-led early termination/non-completion
Timeframe: 9 months
Frequency of application errors/crashes
Timeframe: 9 months
Rate of client data completion in the INCLUDE tool's dashboard
Timeframe: 9 months
Feasibility of the INCLUDE intervention
Timeframe: 4 and 9 months from baseline
Rate of INCLUDE conference meetings
Timeframe: 9 months
Conference meeting time
Timeframe: 9 months
Rate of stigma-reduction activity being recommended
Timeframe: 9 months
Implementation rate of recommended activities
Timeframe: 9 months