Moderate-intensity Statin vs. Individualized LDL-C Target-based Therapy in Older Adults With Type… (NCT07359105) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Moderate-intensity Statin vs. Individualized LDL-C Target-based Therapy in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (iTARGET-Elderly Study)
South Korea2,186 participantsStarted 2026-03-09
Plain-language summary
Statins are the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention through the lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). While the benefits of intensive LDL-C lowering are well-established for secondary prevention, evidence remains insufficient for primary prevention in the elderly-specifically for individuals aged 70 years or older with type 2 diabetes who have no prior history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular events.
Current guidelines generally recommend moderate-intensity statins for this population based on extrapolated data. However, there is a significant evidence gap regarding whether these older adults, who have not yet experienced a cardiovascular event, derive the same risk-benefit ratio from pharmacological intervention as younger or secondary prevention groups. Furthermore, while ezetimibe (alone or in combination) is an effective alternative for patients with established disease, its efficacy as a primary prevention strategy in older diabetic patients has not been rigorously confirmed through randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Therefore, this study specifically focuses on the primary prevention setting, aiming to determine whether individualized LDL-C target-based therapy is non-inferior to standard moderate-intensity statin therapy in preventing first-time cardiovascular events among older patients with type 2 diabetes.
Who can participate
Age range
70 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Provision of written informed consent to participate in the study by the patient or his/her legally authorized representative after receiving and understanding a detailed explanation of the study
* Adults aged 70 years or older
* Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes or currently receiving antidiabetic medication, without a history or presence of cardiovascular disease
* Either: (1) LDL-C≥100 mg/dL if not receiving lipid-lowering therapy, or (2) currently receiving lipid-lowering therapy (in this case, LDL-C level not restricted)
Exclusion Criteria:
* Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes
* Documented history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at screening, confirmed clinically or by imaging: (1) myocardial infarction; (2) coronary revascularization; (3) currently receiving treatment for acute coronary syndrome; (4) history of ischemic stroke; (5) aortic aneurysm; (6) peripheral arterial disease
* Currently undergoing cancer treatment
* Severe disease requiring recurrent hospitalization
* Frailty (defined as a score ≥3 on the Korean FRAIL questionnaire), or any condition significantly limiting self-care
* AST or ALT \>3 × ULN, at screening (however, patients will be eligible if repeat testing at the time of randomization shows levels \<3 × ULN), or liver cirrhosis
* Contraindications to study drugs
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)