Being diagnosed with heart disease can be a life-changing experience, often sparking existential questions and concerns about meaning in life. A lack of meaning in life has been found associated with increased emotional distress and decreased quality of life. Health professionals recognize that issues related to personal meaning in life are relevant but rarely address these aspects systematically in cardiac rehabilitation. This may be due to a lack of necessary tools. The project evaluates a novel, brief and structured intervention that aims to strengthen the experience of meaningfulness and reduce or prevent emotional distress by addressing personal sources of meaning in life among patients attending cardiac rehabilitation and their relatives in Denmark. The intervention is based on the Sources of Meaning Card Method, a method developed by Peter la Cour and Tatjana Schnell to map and explore personal sources of meaning (www.somecam.org). For the current project, the method has been adapted for a cardiac rehabilitation context. Three intervention formats are examined in a feasibility study in a municipal rehabilitation setting: 1) an individual format for patients in cardiac rehabilitation, 2) a dyadic format including a patient together with a relative, and 3) a group format for patients. Approximately 60 patients and 20 relatives are expected to participate. The study explores (a) participants' experience with and acceptability of the intervention formats; (b) changes in meaningfulness and emotional distress in a pre-post design; (c) recruitment and adherence rate, and (d) acceptability and practicality of the three formats among rehabilitation professionals.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Participants' experiences with the three intervention formats
Timeframe: Approximately 1 month post intervention
Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) Questionnaire
Timeframe: 1 month post intervention
Acceptability of the three intervention formats among participants
Timeframe: Approximately 1 month post intervention
Changes in symptoms of depression
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Changes in symptoms of anxiety
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Changes related to meaning in life
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention
Recruitment rate
Timeframe: From study start until recruitment ends (approximately 1 year)
Intervention adherence
Timeframe: Through study completion, approximately 1 year
Study attrition (dropout rate)
Timeframe: Through study completion (approximately 15 months from study start)
Acceptability among rehabilitation professionals
Timeframe: After study enrollment (approximately 1 year from study start)
Practicality of the intervention formats among rehabilitation professionals
Timeframe: After study enrollment (approximately 1 year from study start)
Intervention facilitators' experience with delivering the intervention
Timeframe: Through study completion (approximately 1 year from study start)