EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF OSTEOPATHIC TREATMENT ON CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC NECK PAIN (NCT07260422) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF OSTEOPATHIC TREATMENT ON CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC NECK PAIN
Turkey (Türkiye)40 participantsStarted 2024-11-12
Plain-language summary
This study evaluates whether adding osteopathic treatment to standard physical therapy improves outcomes in adults with nonspecific neck pain. Forty participants are randomly assigned to two groups: one group receives osteopathic techniques (myofascial release, trigger point therapy, craniosacral osteopathy, visceral osteopathy, osteopathic manipulation, and harmonic mobilization) in addition to standard physical therapy (TENS, infrared, and exercise), while the other group receives only standard physical therapy. All participants attend four weekly sessions. Pain, function, quality of life, muscle strength, and cervical range of motion are assessed before and after treatment. The outcomes assessor is blinded to group allocation. This study aims to determine whether osteopathic interventions provide additional benefits over standard physical therapy.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Individuals diagnosed with nonspecific neck pain for at least three months.
* Pain of musculoskeletal origin.
* Adults aged 18-65 years.
* No analgesic medication taken within the previous 24 hours.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Neck pain due to trauma or injury.
* Presence of osteoporosis or fracture risk.
* Inflammatory or rheumatic diseases.
* Presence of psychological disorders.
* Any systemic disease affecting the musculoskeletal system.
* Use of corticosteroid-containing medications.
* Diagnosis of tumor or cancer.
* Inability to complete the treatment process.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Pain Intensity
Timeframe: Baseline and immediately after 4 weekly treatment sessions (4 weeks total)