CompletedNot Applicable

Critical Thinking Volleyball Tactics

Colombia24 participantsStarted 2025-09-01

Plain-language summary

This quasi-experimental study will examine whether a Tactical Critical Thinking Program (TPCT) can improve technical-tactical decision-making in university volleyball players compared with usual training. In many university teams, practice is dominated by repetitive technical drills and coach-centred instruction, with limited opportunities for players to analyse the game, discuss options with teammates, or reflect critically on their decisions. The study compares two groups of adult male volleyball players from a university-level programme in Colombia. The intervention group completed a 4-week Tactical Critical Thinking Program integrated into regular volleyball practice, while the comparison group continued with their usual training routines, without structured reflection or guided questioning. The TPCT uses representative game-based tasks, short planned pauses for group discussion, and questions that prompt players to identify tactical problems, generate alternative solutions, justify their choices, and adjust strategies collectively. All participants assessed before and after the 4-week period. Assessments included validated technical skill tests for serve, reception and spike, and standardised small-sided games (4 vs 4) recorded on video. Trained observers coded each action to calculate decision-making indices for the three key skills, expressing the proportion of tactically appropriate decisions during play. The primary aim was to determine whether adding structured tactical reflection and critical thinking activities to volleyball practice produces greater improvements in decision-making than usual training alone. A secondary aim was to explore whether the TPCT also enhances technical execution. Findings are expected to inform coaches and physical education professionals about how to design cognitively enriched, game-representative training for university team sports.

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

MALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age 18 years or older * University volleyball player enrolled in the participating programme in Medellín, Colombia * Regular participation in team training (at least two organised sessions per week before study enrolment) * Medically cleared and physically able to take part in full volleyball training and match play * Availability to attend the majority of scheduled intervention and assessment sessions over the ≈ 4-week study period * Provision of written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Current musculoskeletal injury or medical condition that limits safe participation in volleyball training or matches * Any medical contraindication to high-intensity intermittent exercise as reported by the participant or team medical staff * Planned absence that would prevent attendance at baseline or post-intervention assessments or more than 20% of training sessions * Concurrent participation in another structured intervention specifically targeting tactical decision-making or psychological skills in volleyball * Withdrawal of consent at any point before completion of post-intervention assessments

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Change in decision-making index during standardized game situations

Timeframe: Baseline (week 0) and immediately post-intervention (within 1 week after the last training session; total intervention period ≈ 4 weeks)

Trial details

NCT IDNCT07253597

SponsorFederal University of Vicosa

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2025-10-15

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Decision Making trials