Background: Digital escape room games have emerged as innovative pedagogical tools in nursing education, providing immersive and engaging learning experiences. Although their use has expanded to various topics, little is known about their impact in teaching the management of life-threatening emergencies such as hypovolemic shock. Aim: To evaluate the effects of a digital escape room game on nursing students' knowledge, satisfaction, and perceptions of hypovolemic shock management. Methods: An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In the quantitative phase, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with 55 third-year nursing students assigned to an intervention group (digital escape room) or a control group (traditional lecture). Knowledge levels were assessed at three time points, and the GAMEX scale measured game experiences. In the qualitative phase, focus group interviews were conducted with 12 students from the intervention group to explore experiences in greater depth. Quantitative data were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, and qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Results: Quantitative findings revealed no statistically significant differences in knowledge scores between the groups over time. However, students in the intervention group reported high levels of enjoyment, motivation, and creative thinking. Qualitative results indicated that the digital escape room reinforced theoretical knowledge, promoted reflection on knowledge gaps, and enhanced critical thinking, problem-solving, and clinical decision-making. Students also emphasized that the game simulated the pressure of real clinical environments, enabling them to practice rapid responses in a safe, engaging context. Conclusion: Although no significant improvements in knowledge scores were detected, the digital escape room offered substantial educational benefits by strengthening motivation, engagement, and higher-level competencies. It may serve as an innovative complementary strategy to traditional teaching in nursing education.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Hypovolemic Shock Information Form to Measure Knowledge Level Regarding Nursing Care in Hypovolemic Shock
Timeframe: On the same day before theoretical training and intervention, 1 day after the intervention and 4 weeks later
GAMEX scale to measure nursing students' satisfaction
Timeframe: on the same day as after the intervention