Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of two different pretreatment protocols-enamel deproteinization and bonding agent application-on the one-year survival of fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars in children. Background: Dental caries is a preventable yet highly prevalent multifactorial disease. Deep pits and fissures are particularly susceptible to caries development, especially in newly erupted molars. Although fissure sealants are considered one of the most effective preventive methods, their clinical success is largely dependent on long-term retention. Contamination of etched enamel surfaces with saliva or gingival fluid is a primary cause of sealant failure. To improve sealant adhesion, several pretreatment methods have been suggested, including bonding agents and enamel deproteinization. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on healthy children aged 7-14 years. Each child contributed at least three permanent first molars to the study, randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A - Acid etching + sealant; Group B - Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C - Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months using visual and tactile methods. Sealant retention, caries incidence, and marginal discoloration were recorded based on standardized criteria. Results \& Conclusion: This study seeks to clarify whether bonding agent or deproteinization pretreatment significantly improves sealant retention and reduces caries incidence compared to the conventional approach. Findings may contribute to defining the most effective clinical protocol for fissure sealant application, ultimately enhancing caries prevention and long-term treatment success in pediatric dental care.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Modified Simonsen Criteria
Timeframe: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
Edge Integrity Evaluation Criteria
Timeframe: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment
Marginal Coloration Evaluation Criteria
Timeframe: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
Anatomical Form Evaluation Criteria
Timeframe: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.