compare the effectiveness of several local anesthetic delivery systems in managing pain, anxiety, behavior, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients. A total of 112 children aged 6 to 10 years were included and randomly assigned to receive local anesthesia via one of the following methods: conventional syringe, computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Star Pen), needle-free injector (Comfort-In), or a vibrotactile device (Vibraject). Pain was assessed using the FLACC and Wong-Baker FACES scales, anxiety with the Venham Picture Test, and behavior with the Houpt scale. Vital signs including pulse and oxygen saturation were recorded during treatment. Additionally, satisfaction levels of both the patients and their parents were evaluated using structured questionnaires and Likert scales. The study seeks to determine which technique provides the most comfortable and effective experience for children undergoing dental procedures.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (behavioral assessment)
Timeframe: From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (self-reported)
Timeframe: From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Anxiety level during dental anesthesia and treatment
Timeframe: From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.