This randomized clinical trial aims to compare two techniques for managing the palatal donor site following gingival graft harvesting: a palatal stent made of flowable composite resin versus conventional suturing. The primary goal is to identify which method provides superior patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), thus optimizing postoperative comfort and overall patient well-being. Systemically healthy patients, free of active periodontitis, requiring a palatal graft as part of periodontal or peri-implant mucogingival surgeries will be recruited and randomized into two groups. The experimental group will receive a palatal shield made of flowable composite resin adhesively secured to adjacent teeth, whereas the control group will undergo conventional suturing. In both groups, a collagen hemostatic sponge will be placed to aid hemostasis. Primary endpoints include postoperative pain measured daily via Visual Analog Scale (VAS), general patient comfort during daily activities such as eating and oral hygiene, and overall patient satisfaction assessed using Likert scales or validated questionnaires. Secondary endpoints involve clinical healing evaluated clinically and photographically at 7 and 14 days postoperatively, incidence of postoperative complications (e.g., prolonged bleeding, infections), analgesic consumption, functional recovery time, and oral health-related quality of life measured by the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Statistical analysis will compare groups using appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests for continuous variables (pain scores, recovery time) and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Pain progression over time will be assessed using repeated-measures ANOVA or an equivalent non-parametric test. This study will help determine whether the palatal stent represents a superior alternative to conventional techniques in improving patient comfort, healing, and postoperative oral health-related quality of life in mucogingival surgical procedures.
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Postoperative Pain
Timeframe: The day of the intervention and every day for the first week
General Patient Comfort
Timeframe: The day of the intervention, every day during the first week and 14 days after the intervention
Patient Satisfaction
Timeframe: The day of the intervention, every day during the first week and 14 days after the intervention