The purpose of this study is to understand how COVID-19 affects people's ability to work and to calculate the costs associated with loss of work. The study compares two groups of participants who are confirmed to have mild-to moderated COVID-19 and who have high chances of the disease becoming severe. The two groups are: People who took the antiviral medication nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (also called Paxlovid) People who were eligible to receive antiviral medication but did not receive any. The participants will be selected from various health databases in the US between June 2021 and December 2022. The main goals are: To look at the characteristics of both groups of participants with COVID-19. To measure how much work these participants missed, including days off and sick leave, and the costs associated with this work loss. To compare work loss and costs between the two groups of participants, considering differences in their clinical and demographic characteristics. The study will evaluate at least 30 days of data from participants after they are confirmed to have COVID-19
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of Participants According to Age Group: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Age Group: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Sex: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Sex: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Region of Residence: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Region of Residence: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Payer Type: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Payer Type: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Insurance Plan Type: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Insurance Plan Type: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Industry Type: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Industry Type: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Quarter (Q) of Index Year: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Quarter of Index Year: Matched Participants
Timeframe: At index date (any date during index date identification period of approximately 11.5 months); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Duration of Follow-up: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Duration of Follow-up: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI): Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean ECI: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI): Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean CCI: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Comorbidities: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Comorbidities: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of High-risk Conditions Per Participant: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of High-risk Conditions Per Participant: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Unmatched Participant
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Matched Participant
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With One or More Prior Hospitalization: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With One or More Prior Hospitalization: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With One or More Prior Emergency Room (ER) Visit: Unmatched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With One or More Prior Emergency Room (ER) Visit: Matched Participants
Timeframe: Pre-period (6 months period before index date; during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With Presence of Any Absence Records: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Number of Absence Days Per Participant Per Month (PPPM): Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Type for Absence Claim: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Cost of Absence Days: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With Any Short Term Disability (STD) Claim: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Number of STD Days PPPM: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Reason for STD Claim: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Cost of STD Days: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants With Any Long Term Disability (LTD) Claim: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Number of LTD Days PPPM: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Number of Participants According to Reason for LTD Claim: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study
Mean Cost of LTD Days: Matched Participants
Timeframe: From index date to the end of follow-up (maximum follow-up was up to an average of 8.3 months during data observation of approximately 1.5 years); retrospective data collected was evaluated in 0.5 months of this study