The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if pacritinib works better than hydroxyurea to treat advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does pacritinib improve disease control compared to hydroxyurea? * What medical problems do participants have when taking pacritinib or hydroxyurea? Researchers will compare pacritinib to hydroxyurea to see if pacritinib is more effective and better tolerated in people with advanced proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either pacritinib twice a day or hydroxyurea for up to 48 weeks. After treatment ends, participants will be followed for up to one year.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving erythroid response in the absence of leukemic transformation.
Timeframe: Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving platelet response in the absence of leukemic transformation.
Timeframe: Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving neutrophil response in the absence of leukemic transformation.
Timeframe: Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving spleen response in the absence of leukemic transformation.
Timeframe: Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.
Clinical benefit at Week 24, defined as achieving symptom response in the absence of leukemic transformation.
Timeframe: Measured from Week 24 through the end of treatment, up to 48 weeks.