Effect of Balloon Angioplasty vs Stenting Following Residual Stenosis After Endovascular Treatmen… (NCT07026331) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingNot Applicable
Effect of Balloon Angioplasty vs Stenting Following Residual Stenosis After Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Acute Ischemic Stroke
China322 participantsStarted 2025-07-03
Plain-language summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether rescue balloon angioplasty versus stenting for residual stenosis following endovascular therapy improves neurological outcomes in patients with acute large vessel occlusion due to large-artery atherosclerosis. Patients will be randomized into two groups: the balloon angioplasty group receiving balloon treatment alone followed by standard medical therapy, and the stent group receiving stenting treatment with post-procedural standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving functional independence (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) at 90±7 days, while the safety endpoint is the probability of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring within 48 hours after randomization.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age ≥18 years
. Pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1
. Acute ischemic stroke symptoms present within 24 hours of last known well time
. Baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥6
. Anterior circulation: Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥6 / Posterior circulation: pc-ASPECTS ≥6
. Occlusion of intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA), M1 segment of middle cerebral artery (MCA), V4 segment of vertebral artery, or basilar artery
. Clinical care team plans to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.