Urgent Panendoscopy in Patients Presenting With Hematochezia (NCT06985277) | Clinical Trial Compass
By InvitationNot Applicable
Urgent Panendoscopy in Patients Presenting With Hematochezia
Thailand188 participantsStarted 2024-04-09
Plain-language summary
Gastrointestinal bleeding is a significant emergency condition requiring prompt diagnosis. Current evidence presents a clinical paradox: urgent colonoscopy (within 24 hours) shows no clear benefit in several studies, while urgent video capsule endoscopy (VCE) demonstrates improved detection rates for small bowel bleeding.
This study aims to evaluate a novel approach combining urgent colonoscopy followed by same-day VCE for patients with normal colonoscopy findings. This strategy has not been previously assessed and may improve bleeding source detection while reducing patient preparation burden compared to standard sequential testing. Results will be compared against conventional approaches to determine optimal diagnostic timing for patients presenting with hematochezia
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age ≥ 18 years
. Admission for maroon stool and/or red blood per rectum with or without hemodynamic instability
. Hemodynamic stabilization after initial fluid resuscitation
. Correction of any coagulopathy prior to endoscopy
. Provision of informed consent
Exclusion criteria
. Hematemesis or nasogastric lavage showing coffee ground material/blood
. Persistent hemodynamic instability prior to colonoscopy
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Diagnostic yield of urgent endoscopy compared to standard endoscopy