Ultrasound Features of Dupuytren's Disease (NCT06956027) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Ultrasound Features of Dupuytren's Disease
Belgium20 participantsStarted 2025-04-24
Plain-language summary
Dupuytren's disease (DD) is a benign and progressive condition that affects the palmar aponeurosis with a very high global incidence. It can result in significant loss of hand function or can inhibit an individual's daily activities or work. Current diagnostics rely on Range Of Motion (ROM) measurements and clinical expertise, where the decision for treatment is primarily based on patient preferences with little scientific research supporting different options in different cases.
With technological advancements new options arise to the possible diagnostic tools that can be used for evidence based medicine and shared decision making. One option comes to light for DD because of its cheap, non -invasive and no radiation load, namely ultrasound (US). The use of US for DD is not standard care, due to the lack of research surrounding this tool. This study will provide some insight into the use of US for DD and will primarily try to evaluate different parameters measurable with US that can be used as potential prognostic biomarkers.
Who can participate
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
✓. Clinical diagnosis of DD and a Tubiana staging not exceeding stage II, TPED does not exceed 90°; this is chosen because to great of a contracture will pose problems with taking the US measurement.
✓. In the clinical assessment the subject has rather soft DD nodules, more firm nodules are more fibrotic and are less likely to contain blood vessels. This will be confirmed by a hand surgeon at the screening phase.
✓. Participant has self reported rapid progression. In the anamnesis the subject reports one of the following: The DD lesion has changed in degree of contracture/nodule size recently; the patient is worried about the function of the involved fingers/hand due to recent progression; the patient is new to DD or has just started experiencing greater discomfort due to a previous existing nodule.
✓. Participant agrees to not undergo any form of surgical treatment for DD during the duration of their participation, being 6 months.
✓. Participant agrees to return to the clinic after 6 months voluntarily for follow-up measurements.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Participant has any other disorder or pathology of the hand/fingers that could affect the quality of US measurements. This list is exhaustive: trigger finger, fracture, hematoma, tenosynovitis, tendon ruptures, scleroderma, fibromatosis, inflammatory conditions, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis.
What they're measuring
1
Echogenicity
Timeframe: At screening and at 6 month follow-up visit
2
Distance from the Duputren's Disease lesion to the skin
Timeframe: At screening and at 6 month follow-up visit
3
Microvascularisation
Timeframe: At screening and at 6 month follow-up visit
4
Disease progression determined by TPED increase after 6 months
Timeframe: At screening and at 6 month follow-up visit
5
Disease progression determined by URAM increase after 6 months
Timeframe: At screening and at 6 month follow-up visit
✕. Participant has received prior treatment for Dupuytren's disease (needle fasciotomy, (micro)fasciectomy) in the hand under investigation.
✕. Participant's affected finger exceeds a TPED over 90° (= Tubiana stage III) (this will affect the value of any US images taken)
✕. Participant undergoes treatment for DD during the course of their participation in this study: exhaustive list: fasciectomy/fasciotomy/stretching braces/collagenase injections