This single-center prospective observational study aims to evaluate the feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and clinical value of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) for initial staging in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). It will compare the diagnostic performance of PET/MRI, including sensitivity, specificity, and staging accuracy, with traditional staging methods such as positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is prevalent in Southeast Asia and North Africa, with approximately 5% of newly diagnosed cases presenting with distant metastases. For patients with N2-3 disease and elevated Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA levels, the risk of distant metastasis can reach 27.5%. Accurate detection of distant metastases at diagnosis is crucial for staging and treatment planning. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT for staging in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, as traditional tools (e.g., chest CT, abdominal ultrasound, bone scans) may yield false-negative results. PET/MRI, as a novel imaging technique, offers potential advantages such as improved diagnostic accuracy, shorter scan times, and reduced false-positive rates. However, its clinical application is limited by high costs and equipment availability. This study will explore the clinical value and economic feasibility of PET/MRI in nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging, aiming to establish its potential role in improving diagnostic pathways.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Sensitivity of PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in NPC
Timeframe: 1 year
Specificity Comparison Between PET/MRI and PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in NPC
Timeframe: 1year
Comparison of Overall Accuracy Between PET/MRI and PET/CT in Detecting Distant Metastases in NPC
Timeframe: 1 year