Hantaviruses are globally distributed viruses that cause haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in Europe, a disease characterised by acute kidney failure and, in some cases, significant bleeding complications. The mechanisms underlying clotting abnormalities in HFRS remain poorly understood. This study aims to investigate the pathological mechanisms of clotting dysfunction in hospitalised HFRS patients, assess the impact of different hantavirus types on disease severity, and evaluate the accuracy of a severity scoring system developed in China for predicting mortality in European patients. Hospitalised patients with laboratory-confirmed HFRS will be prospectively recruited from University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia. Blood samples will be analysed for routine laboratory markers, thromboelastography (TEG) will assess real-time clotting function, and transcriptomic analysis will identify hantavirus strains and gene expression patterns linked to disease severity. Patients will be stratified into haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic groups, with statistical analyses comparing clinical and laboratory parameters to identify predictors of bleeding risk. Findings from this study may contribute to improved risk stratification and potential therapeutic targets for HFRS.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change in Reaction Time (R) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), assessing clot initiation and its association with haemostatic dysfunction in HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in K-Time (K) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), evaluating clot kinetics and fibrin polymerisation in relation to haemostatic abnormalities in HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in Alpha Angle (α-Angle) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), reflecting fibrin build-up and clot formation rate in patients with HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in Maximum Amplitude (MA) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), assessing overall clot strength and platelet contribution to clot stability in HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in Lysis 30 (LY30) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), measuring fibrinolysis and clot breakdown in relation to bleeding risk in HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in Percentage Inhibition (% Inhibition) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), evaluating the effect of antithrombotic pathways on clot formation in HFRS.
Matthew J Riley, MBChB, MRes, DTMH, MRCP(UK)
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later
Change in Percentage Aggregation (% Aggregation) on thromboelastography from admission to follow-up (3-7 days), assessing platelet function and its role in haemostatic dysfunction in HFRS.
Timeframe: Baseline and 3-7 days later