The purpose of this study is to compare both techniques and analyze the data from the "Standard" technique to help design the "PAS" technique. In the "PAS" technique, investigators predetermine the distances from the needles and place them all together using our initial target needle marker in the objective anatomic landmark. Will randomized patients assigning them either in cohort 1 control "Standard" of care technique and cohort 2 "PAS" technique. After only utilizing the "Standard" of care technique, will obtain the measurements and distances from the needles inserted in patients under fluoroscopic guidance for the different pain procedures. The data will help demonstrate that is possible to predict the needle placement replicating with confidence good outcomes using the "PAS" technique to reduce the radiation exposure and time. Our data will justify the use of the "PAS" technique to become an alternative to the "Standard" of care technique for a faster, efficient, and replicable needle placement for diminished radiation exposure, to avoid complications and consistent good outcomes
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Radiation Exposure
Timeframe: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Radiation Exposure
Timeframe: During the index procedure (from first fluoroscopy activation to last activation on Day 0; ≤ 20 min)
Procedure length in time
Timeframe: During the index procedure (from anesthesia induction to application of the final bandage after injection on Day 0; measured in minutes)