Real World Efficiency of Abrocitinib Treatment at Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermati… (NCT06899204) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingNot Applicable
Real World Efficiency of Abrocitinib Treatment at Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis Who Had Inadequate Response to Previous Biologic Therapies.
United States150 participantsStarted 2026-04-24
Plain-language summary
This is a prospective, multi-center observational study characterizing clinical and patient reported outcomes of patients receiving abrocitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (M2S AD) who had inadequate response (or intolerance) to ≤2 previous biologic therapies approved for M2S AD in the United States.
The aim of this study is to measure the effectiveness of abrocitinib in a real-world setting in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, with inadequate response or intolerance to ≤2 biologic therapies.
Who can participate
Age range
12 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Exclusion criteria
.2.1. Inclusion Criteria
. Participants who have chronic AD that has been present for ≥1 year before screening.
. Male and female patients aged \>12 years at baseline.
. Patients with diagnosis of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis confirmed by a certified dermatologist, who are prescribed abrocitinib for use in accordance with the product label (USPI) and independently of the decision to enroll the patient in this study
. Patients who have inadequate responses or are intolerant to ≤2 previous biologic therapy approved for M2S AD. (Patients shall have had an inadequate response and/or intolerance to at least one, but no more than 2 biologic therapies approved for moderate-to-severe AD)
. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the patient (or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. Following receipt of oral and written information about the study, the adolescent (depending on local institutional review board/independent ethics committee requirements) must provide assent, and one or both (according to local regulations) parents or guardians of the child must provide signed informed consent before any study-related activity is carried out.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Percentage of patients achieving EASI-75 improvement from baseline at Week 16 after index date
Timeframe: Baseline, week 16
2
Percentage of patients achieving ≥ 4-point improvement in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) collected daily all through the study from baseline at Week 2 by e-diary assessment
. Patients, who in the opinion of the investigator, are willing and able to comply with regular clinic visits as per standard practice at the site and agree to complete PRO questionnaires and other patient completed questions.