This study is a randomized clinical trial that compares two types of hydraulic cements used in partial pulpotomy procedures for permanent teeth affected by deep decay and pulp inflammation. The purpose of the study is to determine which cement results in better treatment outcomes, such as preserving tooth vitality, reducing pain, and promoting healing. All patients receive a standardized treatment procedure and are then randomly assigned to one of the two cement groups. Key factors such as the time required to achieve hemostasis, the size of the pulp exposure, and other clinical variables are evaluated. Patients are followed up at 15 days and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment to assess their clinical and radiographic outcomes. The results of this study will help improve treatment protocols and guide health care providers in selecting the most effective materials for partial pulpotomy.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Number of Participants with Clinical Success at 15 days
Timeframe: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 weeks
Number of Participants with Clinical Success at 1,3,6 months
Timeframe: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1, 3, 6 months
Radiographic success
Timeframe: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 1, 3, 6, 12 months
Number of Participants with Clinical Success at 12 Months
Timeframe: participants enrolled from end of the treatment to 12 months
Mean Pain Score at 15 Days, 1,3,6 and 12 months Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Timeframe: 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post-intervention