Background:Management of clinically node-negative(cN0) papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is complicated by high occult lymph node metastasis (LNM) rates. We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model for central LNM using machine learning (ML) and traditional nomograms through Probability-based Ranking Model Approach (PMRA). Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study involving 4,882 patients across 3 hospitals (2016-2023). After applying inclusion criteria, 1,953 patients from the primary center were allocated to model train and test (7:3 ratio). External validation included prospective cohorts of 286 and 176 patients from two independent centers.13 ML algorithms and traditional nomogram models were systematically evaluated using PMRA.We compared models using preoperative features alone versus those incorporating both preoperative and intraoperative frozen section pathology data. Feature selection utilized six methods, with L1-based selection proving optimal for most predictions.Model interpretability was enhanced through SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) visualization.
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Predictors were analyzed after the data of 1953 patients were included in the training set and internal validation (at a ratio of 7:3), and the predictors were analyzed in 286 patients and 176 patients, respectively, in two external validation centers.
Timeframe: 2016-2023