Neuronavigation-assisted Stereotactic Puncture With Tenecteplase for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage (NCT06868511) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 3
Neuronavigation-assisted Stereotactic Puncture With Tenecteplase for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage
China732 participantsStarted 2025-04-25
Plain-language summary
Background Minimally invasive puncture surgery followed by thrombolysis has been proven to be an effective approach for managing hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Nevertheless, its impact on improving neurological outcomes remains controversial. The integration of neuronavigation-assisted stereotactic (NAS) technology will significantly help enhance the accuracy of catheter placement, while tenecteplase (TNK), a third-generation thrombolytic agent, with greater potency in lysing platelet-rich clots and heightened specificity for fibrin may improve thrombolysis efficiency. However, the efficacy and safety of combining NAS minimally invasive puncture combined with TNK in reducing disability and mortality rates among patients with acute spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage remain unknown.
Aim To evaluate the efficacy and safety of neuronavigation-assisted stereotactic MIPS combined with TNK thrombolysis （NAS-TNK）in reducing disability and mortality in patients with deep hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.
Design NAS-TNK is a randomized, open-label, outcome-blinded multicenter trial, involving 732 participants with acute basal ganglia or thalamic hemorrhage with a hematoma volume ranging from 20-50 mL. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAS minimally invasive puncture combined with TNK, administered every 24 hours at a dose of 0.009 mg per milliliter of hematoma volume, compared to participants receiving standard medical care. All patients will be followed up for 180 days.
Study outcomes The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of subjects in the NAS-TNK group with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between 0 and 3 at 180 days. The primary safety outcome is the all-cause death at 30-day.
The NAS-TNK study will help improve our understanding of the benefits of NAS minimally invasive puncture combined with TNK in patients with acute spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage. This ongoing research will provide Level I evidence to guide clinicians in managing acute intracerebral hemorrhage treatment options.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Age ≥18 years and \<80 years.
. Symptoms must have manifested within 24 hours prior to the diagnostic CT (dCT) scan. Cases with an indeterminate onset time are excluded. For patients who present symptoms upon sleeping, the last known time they were well should be used.
. Acute spontaneous deep intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) occurring in the basal ganglia or thalamus, with a volume between 20-50 mL as measured by ABC/2 method with radiographic imaging (CT, etc.).
. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 5-14.
. Stability CT scan done at least 6 hours after diagnostic CT showing clot stability (growth\<5 mL as measured by ABC/2 method).
. Randomization should occur within 6 to 24 hours after the diagnostic CT.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 at 180 days.
. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 180 mmHg maintained for a duration of six hours, documented proximate to the randomization time point.
. Historical Rankin score of 0 or 1.
Exclusion criteria
. Lobar or subtentorial hemorrhage, including posterior fossa hemorrhage and cerebellar hemorrhage.
. Stability CT scan done at least 6 hours after diagnostic CT showing clot instability (growth ≥5 mL as measured by ABC/2 method).
. Intraventricular hemorrhage necessitating intervention to address mass effect or midline shift attributable to trapped ventricle syndrome secondary to intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH)-related casting.
. Hemorrhage attributable to other cerebrovascular pathologies, including but not limited to ruptured aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation (AVM), vascular anomalies, moyamoya disease, hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic infarct, or recurrence of a recent hemorrhage within the past year, as diagnosed through radiographic imaging.
. Patients presenting with an unstable intracranial mass or progressive intracranial compartment syndrome.
. Thalamic hemorrhages exhibiting evident extension into the midbrain, accompanied by oculomotor nerve palsy or pupils that are dilated and non-reactive. Other supranuclear gaze abnormalities do not constitute exclusion criteria.
. Irreversible impairment of brainstem function, characterized by bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, extensor motor posturing, and a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≤ 4.
. Indications for craniotomy in patients include: 1) progressive impairment of consciousness; 2) presence of brain herniation, with signs related to cerebellar tonsil herniation or temporal lobe gyrus herniation; 3) hematoma located within 1 cm of the cortical surface.