Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of mixed reality and traditional manikin-based simulation in basic life support (BLS) training, making the hypothesis that mixed reality was non-inferior to manikin-based simulation. Methods: Non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Third-year medical students were randomized in two groups. The mixed reality group (MR) received 32 minutes of individual training using a virtual reality headset and a torso for chest compressions (CC). The manikin simulation group (MK) participated in 2 hours of group training with theoretical and practical sessions using a low-fidelity manikin. The primary outcome was the overall BLS performance score, assessed at one month through a standardized BLS scenario, using a 10-item assessment scale. The quality of CC, students' satisfaction and confidence levels were secondary outcomes, assessed through superiority analyses.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Participants' overall BLS performance at one month after the course
Timeframe: One month after the inclusion