A Randomized Study Comparing Subtotal vs Total Hysterectomy Long Term Outcomes (NCT06802198) | Clinical Trial Compass
Not Yet RecruitingNot Applicable
A Randomized Study Comparing Subtotal vs Total Hysterectomy Long Term Outcomes
Italy500 participantsStarted 2025-10-01
Plain-language summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to assess the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs subtotal laparoscopic hysterectomy + mini-laparotomy for uterine extraction for benign gynecological conditions in terms of change in quality of life at 36 months after surgery and patient's impression of improvement. The secondary objectives of the study are to assess any differences in terms of peri and postoperative outcomes (postoperative pain, blood loss, hospital stay, intraoperative or short and long-term postoperative complications, long term urinary, bowel and pelvic floor symptoms, prevalence of vaginal cuff dehiscence).
Participants will fill the following questionnaires pre-operatively and at the follow up:
* Short Form 36 (SF36),
* Euro Quality of life 5D-3L (EQ 5D-3L)
* Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)
* Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) only during the follow-up period.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
FEMALE
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age\>18 years
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
* Uterine or adnexal pathology suspect for malignancy
* Abnormal or unknown PAP test
* Patients with invasive neoplasia in the previous 5 years (excluding non-melanoma skin tumors, breast cancer T1 N0 M0 Grade 1 or 2 without signs of recurrence or activity).
* Previous radical pelvic surgery or radiotherapy;
* Age \> 80 years
* Pregnant patients
* Desire for further pregnancies
* Contraindications to general anaesthesia or to the Trendelenburg position
* Refusal to sign informed consent
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Quality of life and patient's impression of improvement at 36 months after surgery