The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of two different non-pharmacologic interventions with the control group in reducing pain due to peripheral intravenous catheterization application in children aged 5-12 years. Hypotheses: H1: Pain level differs in the group that received PIK with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H2: The level of fear in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator differs from the control group. H3: Satisfaction level is different in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator compared to the control group. H4: The pain level differs in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H5: The level of fear is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H6: Satisfaction level is different in the group that received PIK application by watching cartoons compared to the control group. H7: Pain level is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H8: The level of fear is different in the Palm Stimulator PIK group compared to the cartoon group. H9: The satisfaction level in the group with PIK application with Palm Stimulator is different from the cartoon group. H10: PIK application time is different in the palm stimulator group compared to the control group. H11: PIK application time is different in the cartoon group compared to the co
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Pain Measurement
Timeframe: 3 months
Fear
Timeframe: 3 months