The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the success of two different bulk-fill restorative materials applied to teeth restored with atraumatic treatment at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-ups. The research seeks to address the following questions:
Which bulk-fill restorative material is more effective in terms of clinical success? How does the clinical success of bulk-fill restorations change over time (3, 6, and 12 months)? How do the two materials compare in terms of functional, aesthetic, and biological outcomes? To what extent does the cavity size of teeth with interproximal caries, restored using atraumatic treatment, influence treatment success? In this study, asymptomatic teeth with aproximal caries in children aged 4-9 will be repaired using atraumatic treatment and assessed based on the Modified USPHS (United States Public Health Service) and Revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Who can participate
Age range4 Years – 9 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Patients and parents of the patients who accept to participate and sign the informed consent.
✓. Children between the ages of 4-9
✓. Healthy children without a history of serious systemic conditions necessitating chronic use of medications.
✓. Children whose dental examination reveals at least one untreated asymptomatic cavitated carious lesion (ICDAS II index: code 4,5,6) affecting primary molars.
✓. Absence of former history of spontaneous pain from the offending tooth/teeth.
✓. Patients with an appropriate level of cooperation to complete treatment under clinical conditions.
✓. Teeth are in a restorable condition. Natural exfoliation of primary teeth to be treated should not be expected within two years.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Patients and parents of the patients who does not accept to participate and sign the informed consent
✕
What they're measuring
1
Change form 3 months to 12 months regarding
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
2
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Marginal adaptation"
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
3
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Surface roughness"
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
4
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Marginal staining"
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
5
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Retention"
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
6
Change from 3 months to 12 months regarding "Incisal wear"
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
7
Functional properties according to revised FDI (World Dental Federation) criteria.
Timeframe: 3-month,6-month,12 month
8
Biological properties according to revised FDI criteria