Mortality and Neurologic Outcomes in Rapid vs. Slow Hyponatremia Correction (NCT06675591) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Mortality and Neurologic Outcomes in Rapid vs. Slow Hyponatremia Correction
Argentina2,037 participantsStarted 2024-03-01
Plain-language summary
This study examines the impact of different rates of sodium correction on the outcomes of patients with severe hyponatremia (serum sodium ≤ 120 mEq/L). Hyponatremia is a condition where blood sodium levels are dangerously low, and its treatment must be carefully managed to avoid complications. Standard guidelines recommend correcting sodium levels slowly to prevent a rare but serious neurological condition called osmotic demyelination syndrome (ODS). However, recent evidence suggests that a faster rate of sodium correction may reduce hospital stay length and mortality without increasing the risk of ODS.
This retrospective study, conducted from 2010 to 2023 at a hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. It compares the outcomes of patients who had their sodium levels corrected rapidly (≥ 8 mEq/L in 24 hours) to those who had slower corrections. The primary outcomes measured are mortality and the development of ODS.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Patients aged 18 years or older.
* First hospitalization at Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires with a serum sodium (natremia) level ≤ 120 mEq/L at admission.
Exclusion Criteria:
* Absence of serum sodium values after the first 24 hours of hospitalization.
* Hospitalizations shorter than 24 hours.
* Patients with previous hospitalizations prior to the study period where admission serum sodium levels were ≤ 120 mEq/L.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
In-Hospital Mortality
Timeframe: From hospital admission to discharge or death. To evalute in-Hospital mortality we will use logistic regression, not time to event analysis.