The goals of this clinical trial study is to evaluate the additive effect, of using ALB-PRF membrane combined with two different types of bone grafts with putty form in treatment of peri-implant bony defects around immediate dental implant within the maxillary esthetic zone. Researchers will compare the ALB- PRF membrane extracted from patient blood with synthetic collagen membrane in addition to the putty form bone graft The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the ALB-PRF is considered suitable alternative to synthetic collagen membrane in GBR techniques? also, growth factors releasing form ALB-PRF can continue over 21 days. Participants will: receive immediate implant with nano-crystalline putty hydroxyapatite as bone graft and collagen as membrane. Also, in other hand participant will receive immediate implant with beta-tricalcium phosphate + calcium sulphate as bone graft and collagen as membrane. and compered with participants receive the same bone and implant technique except for ALB-PRF membrane instead of collagen.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
soft tissue healing. in relation to different membrane and putty form bone
Timeframe: clinical parameters will be reassessed at plate will be measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months postoperative.
Hard tissue healing .
Timeframe: baseline, 6 months and 12 months postoperative