Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of combined virtual and high-fidelity clinical simulation compared with virtual simulation only on theoretical knowledge and clinical judgment in undergraduate midwifery students managing severe preeclampsia. Study Population: Thirty-two undergraduate midwifery students enrolled in a maternal health clinical course at Universidad de los Andes, Chile. Interventions: Group 1 (intervention): Virtual and Clinical Simulation combined (VSimĀ® case followed by hands-on clinical simulation with a manikin). Group 2 (control): Virtual Simulation only (VSimĀ® case). Primary Outcomes: Development of theoretical knowledge (measured by a test) on severe preeclampsia. Improvement in clinical judgment skills (assessed using the Spanish Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric). Secondary Outcomes: Student satisfaction with the training. Perceived self-efficacy in managing severe preeclampsia. Duration: The intervention period lasted five days, including baseline assessment, access to learning activities, and post-intervention evaluation. Methodology: Randomized controlled trial with parallel groups (1:1 allocation). Changes over time and differences between groups were analysed using linear mixed-effects models.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Clinical Judgment in Managing Preeclampsia
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (before randomization) and post-intervention (Immediately after the assigned intervention).
Theoretical Knowledge on Preeclampsia
Timeframe: Pre-intervention (before randomization) and post-intervention (Immediately after the assigned intervention).