This study aimed to compare the use of single implants in the symphyseal and parasymphyseal, and two implants were inserted in the canine area bilaterally to assist mandibular complete overdentures regarding clinical evaluation, marginal bone loss, and masticatory efficiency. The null hypothesis was that there was no statistically significant difference in clinical evaluation, marginal bone loss, and masticatory efficiency among single symphyseal implants, single parasymphyseal implants, and two-implant-assisted complete mandibular overdentures.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Change in the plaque index
Timeframe: The plaque index was documented at follow-up visits on the day of loading, three, six, and nine months later for each implant.
Change in the pocket depth
Timeframe: The pocket depth was documented at follow-up visits on the day of loading, three, six, and nine months later for each implant.
Change in the bleeding index
Timeframe: The bleeding index was documented at follow-up visits on the day of loading, three, six, and nine months later for each implant.
Change in bone level around implant
Timeframe: Immediately after loading, six months, and twelve months later
Change in the masticatory efficiency
Timeframe: The masticatory efficiency was documented at follow-up visits one month and three months after the overdenture insertion