Ruxolitinib Treatment in Inclusion Body Myositis (NCT06536166) | Clinical Trial Compass
RecruitingPhase 2
Ruxolitinib Treatment in Inclusion Body Myositis
France80 participantsStarted 2025-05-27
Plain-language summary
Refer to the "Detailed Description" section.
Who can participate
Age range45 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 45 years
* Effective contraception for the duration of the clinical trial for fertile women of childbearing age
* Defined diagnosis of IBM according to data-derived criteria (Llyod et al, 2014): Patient must fulfill the three following criteria for being diagnosed as IBM: (1) finger flexor or quadriceps weakness; and (2) muscle biopsy showing endomysial inflammation; and (3) muscle biopsy showing invasion of nonnecrotic muscle fibers or rimmed vacuoles
* To be able to walk 6 min without assistance from another person (external assist devices permitted \[e.g., canes, walkers, or rollators\])
* Patient informed and having signed the consent for participation, possibly assisted by a trusted person
Exclusion Criteria:
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding
* Patient under guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice or deprived of liberty
* Patient with cognitive disorders or unable, according to the investigator, to understand the study and/or to give informed consent
* Quadriceps weakness (manual muscle testing, MRC) below or equal 1
* Forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume (FEV) \< 50% of predicted value
* Concomitant use of immunomodulatory drugs including previous treatment with JAK inhibitor, or medications acting on muscle anabolism or catabolism
* Live vaccine within the 4 weeks before starting treatment
* Comorbidity or active chronic disease which contraindicate ruxolitinib:
* Lipid parameters abnormalities/elevations
* Seve…
What they're measuring
1
6 minutes-walk distance (6MWT): A distance walked in 6 min. superior in treated patients compared to placebo group