This controlled, parallel clinical study aims to compare the effect of fixed prosthetic restorations placed in the posterior region with different implant surfaces on clinical and peri-implant marginal bone loss.
The main question(s) it aims to answer are:
Is there a difference between peri-implant marginal bone loss levels in dental implants with two different surfaces placed in the posterior region? Is there a difference in peri-implant clinical parameters in dental implants with two different surfaces placed in the posterior region? The study includes a test group (implant with Ti-Ulta surface) and a control group (implant with Ti-Unite surface).
Two implants with different surfaces will be placed in the bone following the same routine implant placement protocol.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years β 99 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
β. The patient must be between the ages of 18 to 99 years.
β. The patient should not have any systemic diseases.
β. There must be a toothless area in either the mandibular or maxillary region.
β. There must be natural teeth present in the opposing arch.
β. The patient should be periodontally healthy.
β. There should not be any oral or mucosal diseases present.
β. There must be sufficient bone present for implant placement, with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm and a height of 8 mm.
Exclusion criteria
β. Patients who fall outside the specified age range.
β. Patients with systemic diseases.
β. Patients who have received radiotherapy to the head and neck region.
What they're measuring
1
Peri-implant marginal bone loss
Timeframe: 1-year follow-up of all implants after prosthetic loading