Stopped: Efficacy signal substantial enough to more to larger study
rhPRG4-GVHD-001 is a prospective multi-center study conducted in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically-applied rhPRG4 in subjects with moderate to severe dry eye secondary to chronic GVHD.
Age range
18 Years – 90 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the average VAS score assessing subjects' eye dryness (Question: Rate the dryness of your eye; anchors: 0 = no discomfort, 100 = maximal discomfort) at Day 28
Timeframe: 28
To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28
Timeframe: 28
To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events
Timeframe: 28